Case Name:Plaintiff Liu Wei v.Defendant Bank of China Luoyang Branch and Bank of China Luoyang Stadium Road Branch Savings Contract Dispute Case.

　　Undertaker:Cao Mingzhe(acting as the agent for the second defendant,Bank of China)

　　Cause of action:Dispute over savings contract

　　Case summary:The plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the Xigong Court claiming that the balance of 6000 yuan in the card was stolen and swiped.The plaintiff demanded that the two defendants bear compensation liability on the grounds that they did not properly safeguard the security of the depositor's account.

　　Result:The plaintiff's lawsuit request was rejected.

　　Business achievements:

　　1.Case characteristics:Although the amount involved in this case is relatively small,the defendant Bank of China,as a state-owned enterprise,has a significant impact on the final outcome of the case.Bank of China values social influence more in this case,so it should collect evidence that is as helpful as possible to the case outcome,in order to facilitate the court's investigation of the facts.

　　2.Case handling experience:Through the handling of this case,I have become more convinced of the importance of evidence in civil litigation,even if it is not directly related to the case.As long as it can form a chain of evidence with the main evidence,it can still achieve twice the result with half the effort and ultimately affect the judgment of the case.

　　3.Highlight:The highlight of this case is the transfer record of the plaintiff's bank card from China UnionPay Henan Branch,which was applied to be retrieved from the court.The evidence collection process was difficult,and it was only after three visits to Zhengzhou with the court judge that the evidence was successfully collected,providing favorable support for the verdict of this case.